Home About Us Media Kit Subscriptions Links Forum
EDUCATION UPDATE BLOGS
Vicki Cobb: April 2012 Archives

April 2012 Archives

An Explosion of Learning By Vicki Cobb

  |   Comment   |   Bookmark and Share
How do you get third graders shrieking with excitement over the solar system? By up-ending the traditional ways of teaching it, throwing out old lesson plans and taking advantage of our school-wide mentoring program. Since I was directly involved, I have a lot of skin in this game and was hoping that this could happen. But there is always risk in doing something new.

I’m working with the two teachers, Alicia Palmeri and Carla Christiana, of Bogert Elementary in Upper Saddle River, NJ and their students via videoconferencing as part of our schoolwide pilot project by my start-up company iNK Think Tank. We are a group of award-winning children’s nonfiction authors who are mentoring both teachers and students who are using our books as they fit into their curriculum. The iNK group doing the mentoring is Authors on Call. We are working in all disciplines in grades 3, 4, 5 and the sessions with teachers and conferences with students are timed to coordinate with what’s happening in the classroom. It is an innovative, organic approach to content and literacy that seems to infect everyone with the love of learning.

In my initial interactive videoconference with Alicia and Carla, I stressed that learning about the solar system meant thinking about how we know about it. We look at the sky and see two things: light and motion—i.e. bodies of light that move. That’s it! The stars, sun and moon rise and set. Planets, which mean “wanderers,” move over a period of time against the background pattern of stars. Sometimes they move backwards for a while but they ultimately come back to the same place in the sky where they were first observed. From this information, we have to figure out what’s actually happening.

Alicia and Carla agreed to use my approach to introduce the unit by asking the children to first think about motion. As part of our project, Bogert is using my book called What’s the BIG Idea? The introduction to the book defines “a BIG idea” as one for which there are no quick or easy answers. There are four BIG ideas in this book: motion, energy, matter, and life. Science tackles BIG ideas. How? The same way you eat an elephant: one bite at a time. Science, itself is a big idea. Every topic is broken down into a series of questions in a logical sequence. The answer that follows each question is full of simple hands-on activities that illustrate concepts. This book, by the way, meets all eight core curriculum standards for science. So to begin this unit, I asked the teachers to give their students the first question in the book, which is displayed on a double-page spread.

I suggested that they print out a pdf of the page (which I supplied) and give it to their students and ask them to think about the question and talk about it with each other and their parents for a day without giving them the answer. This is not the typical approach. Teachers often report feeling compelled to answer kids’ questions immediately so that they do well on tests. Quick answers also tend to stop further questions.) Right from the git-go asking the teachers and students to dwell on a question for twenty-four hours was outside-the-box. I was extremely gratified that Carla and Alicia grasped the importance of teaching the content as I’ve organized it in my book, although it meant writing up completely new and different lesson plans. The logical sequence of the questions in What’s the BIG Idea? ultimately gives a foundation for understanding many concepts,including the celestial mechanics of the solar system. The first question is: Why does a rolling ball stop rolling? After dancing with mystery overnight, the next day the kids were more than ready to read the text that begins to explain the First Law of Motion. They then followed up with the second question in the book: “How do we know the earth is moving when it looks like the sky is moving?” This led to an understanding of stellar parallax—the concept first put forward by Copernicus as proof the earth moved, although the tools needed to actually see it hadn’t been invented yet.

I then met the students for my first interactive video conference where I told them the story of how Galileo was sent to prison for life for suggesting that the earth was moving around the sun. That powerful story made quite an impression! The teachers were hoping that this session with me would generate questions for the kids to research.

There was no question that the students were very interested, engaged, and enthusiastic. Clearly they were motivated to learn more. And I didn’t want them to lose that. But the questions that the kids came up with weren’t really good questions for a research report. A meaningful research question depends on knowing something about the subject. These kids didn’t know enough yet to ask such questions. So I started worrying about how to get them to learn more.

I believe that elementary school science needs to focus more on HOW scientists learn. Astronomers learn a lot about the universe by studying pictures and recent technology has produced extraordinary photos of all sorts of heavenly bodies. These photos are free on the NASA website. How about asking the children to explore the site, working with partners on assigned topics within the solar system, to find something personally exciting and interesting to share with others? (The specific facts are not important.) I suggested this to the teachers through a LOT of writing on our wiki. (You can see for yourself on the page: http://bogert-authorsoncall.wikispaces.com/Carla+Christiana) After visiting the NASA website, Carla agreed but expressed some reservations:

“I’ve had some more time to think about the new research assignment. I’m thinking that I will assign partners to each one of the topics you mentioned (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Moon, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto) I’m excited to have the children use the NASA website because the pictures are very vivid and I agree that they will generate excitement. The only problem I am having is the level of difficulty of the text on the NASA website. I know my 8 year olds are going to experience some challenges with comprehending what they are reading. I think they will learn valuable things from the website, but I have some reservations about the site at the same time. Hopefully working in partnerships will help with this problem but let me know your thoughts.”

My response: “I agree. Some of the reading is challenging and it gave me pause. You might want to poke around in the “For Kids” section. However, I think it’s also an opportunity to expose kids to the way scientists write--it takes some skill and background knowledge to read these texts for meaning. Tell them that this is very challenging reading and you don’t expect them to understand it. It’s ok to let them know it’s a challenge. You might be surprised at how they rise to the occasion.”

The outcome? Surprising and delightful! Carla wrote: “After telling them that the site we are reading from was written by NASA and that some adults thought the text might be too hard to read, they took on the challenge and read with vigor throughout the research session. Students began to shriek with excitement at first glimpses of the photographs of their planets and were calling their partners over to their computers to show the interesting facts they discovered and pictures they found. Two groups realized that the same instrument was used to collect data on two different planets. I look forward to having more time to research tomorrow afternoon.”

When I next met with the students, they were full of questions about their discoveries. And these were the kind of questions that required further research. “Why is Neptune green? What does that tell us about the planet?” “Why doesn’t Mercury have moons?” “Why does Jupiter have so many moons?” “How did the rings form around Saturn?” One question about the Comet Lovejoy got me curious enough to go on the site myself. Apparently, this comet survived a close encounter with the sun. I checked it out and their research was correct!! Questions like “How do planets form?” led me to suggest going to the library to read a book about it. In general, the questions were far more specific and insightful than before they did some exploration.

Clearly they were motivated to learn more. I asked them how they felt about making discoveries. They said that they were confused at first but when they stumbled upon something familiar they got interested and began reading. Some of the kids asked the teachers if they were allowed to go on the website at home! Imagine that! Asking permission to learn more! Despite a couple of technology glitches where we lost the call, I felt that the children were well on their way to some meaningful learning about how to do research, how it feels to make a discovery, how scientists look at the heavens and how we know some of what we know about the solar system.

The collaborating partners are each writing reports that are going to be organized into a giant poster about the solar system with the children’s research findings in the position of their subject of interest in the solar system. Not too shabby for third grade.

Originally Published in SB&F on April 2012

In Your Own Words, What Do You Think?

  |   Comments   |   Bookmark and Share
Like most authors, I remember negative reviews. When the first two books of my Imagine Living Here Series were published back in the early nineties, the reviews were mostly quite positive. But one critic said that the books were “Not good for reports.” It got me thinking, what did that mean? This Place is Cold is about Alaska and This Place is Dry is about the Sonoran Desert in Arizona. The adjective that describes each place allowed me to write the books from a point of view: Why is it cold or dry? How does the climate affect the flora and fauna? How does it affect the lifestyle of people? How does it impact the culture –the art, clothing, festivals, etc? In other words, the information about these places was organized around the thesis that the climate had an overriding impact on every aspect of life in these parts of the world.

Now let’s imagine the students who have an assignment to do a research papers about Alaska. They go to online and look up the place and get the facts. They list these facts and (ta da!) they’ve produced their reports. It’s possible that many students cut and paste the facts into a report without passing any of it through their own brains. My guess is that my books weren’t deemed worthy for reports because perhaps the unique organization and my “voice” made it difficult to plagiarize as opposed to the “vanilla” writing in reference works.

The Common Core Standards for writing are more concerned with the process of researching and writing than the product. They want students from kindergarten on to: “research to build and present knowledge.” They want students to study how nonfiction authors write and they expect that by third grade, students will “Participate in shared research and writing projects (e.g., read a number of books on a single topic to produce a report; record science observations).” In other words, students will have to do close reading of a number of sources to prepare to write something in their own words. So the bar for such reports is far higher now than back when my books first came out.

As every scientist, historian, and doctoral candidate knows, you have to formulate a question that your research can answer. But in order to ask a good question, you have to KNOW something. This means that reading a lot is prelude to writing. Reading a lot is also known as research. So there are two stages to research:
    1: Reading to educate yourself so you can formulate a thesis.
    2. Researching to fill in the blanks so you can articulate your thesis persuasively. This research can include experiments, interviews, other media, etc.

One of the things we’ve noticed in the Authors on Call pilot program with the Bogert School this year is that the teachers are in a hurry to have the kids write reports. They want to make report assignments almost as soon as they’ve introduced a topic. My interaction with the students was to help them find subjects for reports. It was immediately clear to me that the kids didn’t know enough to ask a meaningful question. They’ve been reading my book "What’s The BIG Idea?" in their classroom work. This book is about
150px-II_Rabi.jpg the questions scientists ask that lead to BIG ideas about motion, energy, matter and life. In the introduction, where I define a BIG idea as one for which there is no quick or easy answer, I tell the story of Isador Isaac Rabi (1898-1988) who discovered magnetic resonance—the phenomenon behind MRIs . (He won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1944.) He said that he owed his success in science to his mother. Everyday, when he came home from school, she would ask him, “So, what good question did you ask today?”

The Common Core Standards are asking for nothing less than a culture change in education. Where NCLB was focused on answers so kids could do well on high-stakes tests, now we will be focusing on process—how to get students to think critically and creatively which means asking questions and learning how to do research to get answers. Only then will students be able to speak and write in their own words.

They are going to need our help.

Education Update, Inc. All material is copyrighted and may not be printed without express consent of the publisher. © 2011.