Home About Us Media Kit Subscriptions Links Forum
 
APPEARED IN:

Mar/Apr 2013View Select Articles

Download PDF

FAMOUS INTERVIEWS

Directories:

SCHOLARSHIPS & GRANTS

HELP WANTED

Tutors

Workshops

Events

Sections:

Books

Camps & Sports

Careers

Children’s Corner

Collected Features

Colleges

Cover Stories

Distance Learning

Editorials

Famous Interviews

Homeschooling

Medical Update

Metro Beat

Movies & Theater

Museums

Music, Art & Dance

Special Education

Spotlight On Schools

Teachers of the Month

Technology

Archives:

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

1995-2000


SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2013

GUEST EDITORIAL
New Standards to Prepare Educators
By Mary Brabeck, Ph.D.

Mary BrabeckThe focus of many of us in schools and departments of teacher education and school leadership this fall, will be on the new accreditation standards approved August 29-30, 2013, at the first meeting of the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) Board of Directors.

At that meeting CAEP adopted new accreditation standards for programs that prepare educators (e.g., teachers, school leaders). Under the new standards, all educator preparation programs will be judged by looking at how well their graduates’ P-K-12 students learn.  Programs must demonstrate through multiple measures, high quality evidence of PK-12 student learning which may (depending on the capacity in the state) include standardized test scores.

Much more research needs to be done to identify the components of programs that develop effective teachers.  However, the CAEP standards are based on the best available evidence regarding a high quality preparation program.  This includes evidence that graduates have deep content knowledge of the subjects they teach and can successfully teach that content. Programs will need to show they provide quality clinical experiences and that they graduate educators who are ready for the many challenges of today’s schools and classrooms. They will also have to demonstrate that they recruit, select, prepare, and graduate a diverse teaching pool for today’s classrooms, and that their recruitment efforts demonstrate rigorous plans to meet areas of local need (e.g., Special Education, STEM, ELL teachers).   They will need to provide data that show faculty engage in continuous improvement of their curricula, as well as summative assessments of the degree to which their programs are achieving their goals.   The standards are available online and will be in effect with accreditation reports filed in 2016.

The standards are the result of the CAEP Commission on Standards and Performance Reporting.  This diverse group brought together for the first time The National Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC) and the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE).  The Commission included the diverse (and sometimes contentious) stakeholders: teacher educators, education deans, “reformers” critical of university-based teacher education, teacher unions, content experts, P-12 teachers, parents, school leaders, state policymakers, and representatives of education policy/advocacy organizations.

This is an historic moment, a moment when higher education joined with both critics and advocates of teacher preparation, and created an accountability system that raises the bar significantly. It is a rare moment of the profession policing itself.  As the elected chair of the Board of Directors of CAEP, I look forwards to the significant challenges that implementation of these new standards will raise. I believe that collectively we will move forward in quality preparation of teachers and school leaders for our country’s K-12 schools.#

Mary Brabeck, Ph.D. Gale and Ira Drukier Dean of the Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development.

COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE

Name:

Email:
Show email
City:
State:

 


 

 

 

Education Update, Inc.
All material is copyrighted and may not be printed without express consent of the publisher. © 2013.