Home About Us Media Kit Subscriptions Links Forum
EDUCATION UPDATE BLOGS
Dr. Lloyd I. Sederer: March 2012 Archives

March 2012 Archives

Coauthored by Dr. Matthew D. Erlich

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
--Arthur C. Clarke

In fact, advances in neurotechnology are capitalizing on the brain's remarkable sleight of hand.

Neurotechnology refers to the applied science of understanding the brain, consciousness, thought, and higher-order activities of the mind. Neurotech's brainchildren are today's mental magic. Such fantastical items include electrode-laden "thinking caps" or Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (TDCS) to enhance human concentration; neuroimages of our dream lives, and perhaps even our waking thoughts; remote artillery weapons that soldiers can fire at a combatant by mind control; and video games operated by the player's thoughts. These aren't a sci-fi creation; now they're real.

Advancing from science fiction to applied science is a fast-growing, $8-billion business, with investments from commercial, military, and academic interests. This might seem to be good news for countless sufferers from neurological (e.g., Alzheimer's and other dementias, Parkinson's disease, Multiple Sclerosis, stroke, etc.) and mental disorders (e.g., depression, PTSD, OCD, mania, etc.). But for every scientific step forward, there is the chill of possible diabolical applications -- where there's neural firing, there's apt to be the smoke (and mirrors?) of self-serving and questionable ethics.

This is the first of a two-part series examining emerging neurotechnologies and their potential value. In the second post to follow, we will consider their ethical and practical conundrums.

The diagnosis and treatment of behavioral health conditions has yet to fulfill the promises of the 1990s, the so-called "Decade of the Brain." Since then, technological wizardry has transformed our markets, if not our lives. The next iProduct comes with lines of consumers snaking around the block. But for the people who just want to feel well, diagnostic and treatment advances in psychiatry and neurology still lack a magic bullet.

Here's the good news: With neuroimaging advances, the brain is a veritable neural Google Map. Functional MRI (fMRI) neuroimaging, as well as PET and CT scans, now allow medical scientists to observe a highly detailed landscape of the brain that reveals locations where mental diseases emerge, where behavioral therapies might do their job, and how a drug can find entry into the brain. It can even pinpoint the brain's "funny bone" -- or which neurons light up when we laugh at a joke.

An fMRI scan uses an electromagnetic field to navigate the brain, much in the same way a compass has guided travelers for millennia. One notable neuroimaging explorer is Dr. Helen Mayberg, a neurologist who identified a tract of brain tissue deep within the frontal cortex known as "Area 25," a region that is likely a "nerve center" for depression. When a depressed person responds to treatment with antidepressants and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), neuroimaging reflects a corresponding response in Area 25.

Beyond imaging to pinpoint neural landmarks and monitor responses to therapeutics is repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), an example of using applied science to treat depressed (and anxious) people. Resembling a large wand, rTMS is an FDA-approved treatment for depression in which a low-frequency electromagnetic pulse is applied to specific areas of the brain through the scalp, never directly touching the brain; it is performed safely in your doctor's outpatient office. Research demonstrates that rTMS improves mood -- and without the side effects of medication or using electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Moreover, rTMS may help lessen the intrusive thoughts of obsessive-compulsive disorder, improve the painful apathy associated with certain psychotic disorders, and diminish chronic pain due to migraine headaches and phantom limb syndrome.

Broaching the realm of science fiction, rTMS may even have an effect on our thoughts and morality. When the wand is waved over the brain's right temporoparietal junction, it seems to exert a neuronal "superego" force! In one study, research subjects responded to a morality play where they were asked whether Cain should slay Abel. Chillingly, rTMS was able to dampen study participants' ability to judge right from wrong. Remember the brainwashing of Laurence Harvey in The Manchurian Candidate?

rTMS is not alone. Modern electro- and magneto-encephalography can now detect tumors, find stroke sites, and localize areas prone to epilepsy. Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) utilizes a surgically implanted probe -- a brain "pacemaker" -- that stimulates brain regions instrumental to Parkinson's disease and depression. Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are poised to enable a person's thoughts to operate a computer that could drive a wheelchair, operate a pain pump, or communicate for people who can think but not talk.

Advanced drug delivery systems are being developed to zero in on diseased brain sites or turn on genes that could promote cell growth -- and do so with little damage. Smart drugs or "nootropics" that selectively boost the neural circuits of memory and cognition are another budding frontier. And why not have an amnesic pill to erase bad memories or disabling trauma? Perhaps most incredible is the field of optogenetics, where specially engineered, light-activated (or inactivated) neurons are implanted in the brain to control anxiety. This work is underway with mice, a few cortical steps away from man. Beam me up, Scotty.

As science makes a reality of what has been science fiction, we will face questions of how to best apply neurotechnologies. Should these advances be limited to helping those who have illnesses? Or should they bolster the performance of a wartime soldier, enable a C student to get straight As, or supercharge corporate CEOs? Should an MRI or an EEG be used for lie detection or "brain fingerprinting"? If a magnetic wand can influence human morality and tip right to wrong (or vice versa), then what mischief lies ahead in using neurotechnologies to perform Jedi mind tricks on unwitting victims?

In part two of this article, we will look at how the value of neurotechnologies may go astray in the hands of mere humans.


The opinions expressed here are solely those of Drs. Erlich and Sederer, as physicians and public health advocates. Neither receives support from any pharmaceutical or medical device company.

Originally Published by Huffington Post on March 21, 2011
Enhanced by Zemanta
Once again, the American Academy of Pediatrics is demonstrating its clinical leadership. Two recent, groundbreaking reports -- "The Lifelong Effects of Early Childhood Adversity and Toxic Stress" and "Early Childhood Adversity, Toxic Stress, and the Role of the Pediatrician: Translating Developmental Science Into Lifelong Health" -- by the Academy boldly declare what has been known but too hidden from sight: Namely, that brain and emotional development is profoundly disrupted by childhood adversity and trauma.

The pediatric academy quotes Frederick Douglass who said, "It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men."

Toxic stress, or early environmental trauma, has been proven to disrupt normal brain development and trigger genetically predisposed diseases. The tragic results include impairments in the ability to regulate emotions and learn, to adapt socially with others and produce, in adolescence and adulthood, lifelong physical and mental disorders, including heart disease, asthma, arthritis, obesity, diabetes, cancer, depression, substance abuse and PTSD. Trouble staying and succeeding in school are also common, as are brushes with the law.

Adverse Childhood Events, or ACEs, were initially studied by Kaiser Health of Southern California and then by the World Health Organization (WHO) World Mental Health Survey Initiative. ACEs include:

1. Direct psychological abuse
2. Direct sexual abuse
3. Direct physical abuse
4. Substance abuse in household
5. Mental illness in household
6. Mother treated violently
7. Criminal behavior in household

The greater the number of ACEs, the greater the risk of developing a chronic disease, or multiple chronic diseases. From post traumatic disorder research we know the greater the severity and frequency of the trauma the more like it will burn itself into the brains neural circuitry.

The mechanisms by which early childhood adversity lays its toxic roots are numerous and complex. The manifestations are as specific as youth engaging in impulsive and dangerous behaviors (well beyond normal adolescent risk taking), including reckless (and drunk) driving and unprotected sexual behaviors, which can result in sexually transmitted diseases and teenage pregnancies. The mechanisms are as fundamental as the unregulated and ongoing release of stress hormones, including cortisol and adrenaline, which weaken body defenses (compromising the immune system's ability to protect from infection and cancer or to turn our immune systems against us in the form of autoimmune diseases), raise blood pressure, promote plaque formation in arteries, and are linked, neurologically, to depressive and post-traumatic stress illnesses.

The specialty of pediatrics was first to develop "medical homes" (popularized today with federal enabling legislation) designed initially for the young with serious and chronic illnesses whose proper care needs to be monitored and clinically managed by one responsible (accountable) doctor and clinic. Pediatricians have long used screening tools to track childhood development and more recently many have introduced depression screening (and treatment paths) as basic tenets of good care. Their declaration, through these recent reports, of the impact of childhood trauma is a rallying call for what heretofore was another example of "don't ask, don't tell."

There are many proven approaches to these problems. Among them are:

- Home visits by nurses to mothers identified as being at high risk for emotional problems (e.g., Dr. David Olds' Nurse Home Visiting Program)

- Primary care screening and early intervention for depression in moms

- Pediatric screening and early intervention for depression and addictive disorders in youth

- Parental skills training programs (e.g., Positive Parenting, The Incredible Years, Bright Futures, About Our Kids)

- Youth support programs (e.g., Big Sister, Big Brother, after school programs)

- Pediatric medical homes that holistically support child development and deliver health, mental health and wellness services

- Trauma-focused mental health programs (for youth already affected)

The health of our youth, today and into their futures, can be protected. We can prevent the diseases and disabilities that result from childhood adversity and trauma. State and national budgets can be protected from decades of preventable health, correctional and social welfare expenditures. By following the wise counsel of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and other professional and policy groups, early experience need not be destiny for countless children, their families and their communities.

Originally Published by Huffington Post on February 2, 2012.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Education Update, Inc. All material is copyrighted and may not be printed without express consent of the publisher. © 2011.