Home About Us Media Kit Subscriptions Links Forum
EDUCATION UPDATE BLOGS
Dr. Lloyd I. Sederer: December 2011 Archives

December 2011 Archives

Sleepwalking Is For Real

  |   Comments   |   Bookmark and Share
I have had trouble sleeping for about 25 years. I am among legions of people who share the same trouble.

Some have difficulty falling asleep. They toss and turn as thoughts race through the brain while infusing the body with neurotransmitters and stress hormones that further rev up our engines. Some awake after several hours to have the same experience as their insomniac counterparts, only later in the night. Still others make it until early in the morning when their mind overpowers the tired body and robs it of more needed rest. Some poor souls have all three, but that is uncommon.

There are many causes for these forms of nocturnal misery. If trouble sleeping plagues you or someone you care about then talk to a doctor, because a sleep disturbance may be the tip of a medical iceberg. Loss of physiologically-restorative sleep also impairs concentration, performance and judgment. Many simple and good remedies exist.

I want to report on one remedy I tried that transported me to quite a remarkable experience, namely sleepwalking.

I fall asleep immediately (thank goodness) but soon awake, again and again, with my mind suffused with dreams and experiences from the most mundane to the otherworldly. When my sleep problems worsened in recent years, I sought medical and alternative medicine consultations and cures. My three sleep studies (done by an EEG, an electroencephalogram, and an innovative home device under development) all had remarkably consistent findings: I drop into slumber but then awake as often as dozens of times a night -- though not significantly attributable to apnea (breathing problems), neurological illness (restless legs syndrome or early Parkinson's disease) or other known causes. The conclusion was that my sleep is disrupted (I knew that) for reasons not understood (at least not signaling worrisome diseases).

What could I do? There are the general measures of avoiding caffeine late in day, getting exercise, limiting alcohol to modest consumption, not getting all riled up before bedtime and the like: This is called sleep hygiene. I had been trying these but with limited effect. As a doctor, I am not against medications but tend to be conservative and hoped to avoid sleeping pills.

But my fatigue was wearing me down. After a year or more of waking in the morning needing a nap I decided to try various sleeping agents. I tried melatonin, homeopathic remedies and other non-prescription aids without benefit.

I had taken AmbienŽ (zolpidem) on overnight plane flights and it had worked. I began on a trial of this medication, in its short and longer-acting forms. It was helping, a little, in that I awoke less often and my overactive dreaming was muted. I was concerned about getting dependent on a sleeping pill but zolpidem's pharmacology suggests it does not produce withdrawal or a need for higher doses. I began taking it a few nights a week to see if I might change my sleep pattern.

Then one night the strangest thing happened. After a few hours of sleep, I got up, went to the bathroom and ran water for a bath. My wife was sound asleep, as is her great fortune. It had been a while since I took a bath in this country and never in the middle of the night. The water was pleasantly warm when I immersed myself. I realized that the t-shirt I had left on was getting drenched so I took it off and draped it over the tub's edge. I wondered what I was doing in the bath but it was pleasant and I continued to soak luxuriously, not bothering to lather with any soap. I carefully replaced the towel on the rack but left the bath mat on the floor and wet garments scattered about. When I awoke in the morning the proof of my twilight behavior was indisputable: a wet shirt and towels in the bathroom, a closet cabinet open where I had fetched fresh and dry underwear that I was now wearing, and a dim recollection of having taken a relaxing bath. My wife did not awake so could not confirm my meanderings but could see the detritus I had left.

When I told my doctor about my sleepwalking experience he said we better find another medication. I know he was not trying to deprive me of tub pleasures but rather prevent some unwelcome accident during the night, whatever that might be.

Sleepwalking, I thus attest, is for real. I don't know the full measure of what is possible during this altered state. I don't want to find out. I would rather toss and turn, or maybe just get up and take a bath.

The opinions expressed here are solely my own as a psychiatrist and public health advocate. I receive no support from any pharmaceutical or device company.

Originally published in The Huffington Post on December 14, 2011.

Visit my website www.askdrlloyd.com for questions you want answered, reviews, commentary and stories.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Screening Our Youth for What Ails Them

  |   Comments   |   Bookmark and Share
In another needed response to the obesity epidemic affecting American youth (and the adults they will become), the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, part of the Federal National Institute of Health, has declared that pediatricians should be checking cholesterol when kids reach the age of 9 and before they are 11, and again when they reach 17 and before 21. The American Academy of Pediatrics, the national professional association for pediatricians, proceeded to endorse the institute's recommendation.

A popular business maxim is "What gets measured gets managed." When a child's blood sugar is 400 everyone jumps and insulin is on the way to prevent a diabetic coma. When a person's blood pressure is 180/120, child or adult, that number drives doctors, patients and families to get the pressure to a normal number, hoping to do so before that poor soul strokes out. From a public health standpoint, for a population of people of whatever age, when a specific measure becomes standard operating procedure in medical practice the sooner everyone, including doctors, nurses and patients, learns to medically -- or by lifestyle interventions -- manage the condition that threatens to undermine their wellbeing and abbreviate their time on earth.

Levels of cholesterol, blood pressure and sugar drive a doctor's practice because they are numbers in black and white in a medical record. They are inescapable reminders that work needs to be done. No one can rest, provider or patient, until that number is in "the normal range." That's why requiring cholesterol screening early and repeatedly is a good thing: Measuring cholesterol means we all are far more apt to manage it -- and reduce the risk of developing the heart and blood vessel diseases that will compromise the quality and duration of the lives of those affected.

In April of 2009, the US Preventative Task Force issued a report about screening for depression in children and adolescents, a disorder whose presence and impact on functioning is no less worrisome than high cholesterol. The Task Force studied "... primary care screening for Major Depressive Disorder among children and adolescents ages 7 to 18 years, including evaluating the accuracy of screening tests and the risks and benefits of treatment with psychotherapy and/or SSRIs."

It concluded that "... available data suggest that primary care feasible screening tools may be accurate in identifying depressed adolescents, and treatment can improve depression outcomes." But they stopped short by stating "... treating depressed youth with SSRIs [antidepressants] may be associated with a small increased risk of suicidality [note: not completed suicide but rather feeling suicidal] and therefore should only be considered if judicious clinical monitoring is possible."

Who would dare say that treatment proceed only if "clinical monitoring is possible" for youth with high sugar or blood pressure? Why is depression different?

It is possible to screen, monitor and manage depression when it is made a standard of medical care. It is already successfully going on in some exemplary pediatric (and adult) practices. It will be possible when depression is recognized as no less a problem than diabetes or high cholesterol. It will be possible when we stop treating mental problems as secondary citizens in the world of public health, which should happen, since the World Health Organization has alerted health ministries globally that by 2030 neuropsychiatric disorders* will be the leading contributor to the "global burden of disease," a measure of years of life lost as a result of living in less than full health and to early death.

Right now our car is checked with a battery of tests during a regular inspection. We can't drive our car (legally) without passing inspection by fixing what is wrong. Why would we drive our body without treating what ails it? Why not ensure that medical "inspection" (and treatment) includes depression than see lives break down because we neglected to detect and treat, early and effectively, so common and potentially disabling a disorder?

*Includes bipolar disorder, depression, schizophrenia, epilepsy, alcohol and drug use disorders, Alzheimer's and other dementias, Parkinson's, PTSD, OCD, and panic disorder. 


The opinions expressed here are solely my own as a psychiatrist and public health advocate. I receive no support from any pharmaceutical or device company.

Originally Posted in The Huffington Post on November 15, 2011.
Enhanced by Zemanta
Education Update, Inc. All material is copyrighted and may not be printed without express consent of the publisher. © 2011.